![]() But if you'd like some more background about what they do and how they work, see Azure Pipelines agents. If you already know what an agent is and how it works, feel free to jump right in to the following sections. If you're using Azure DevOps Services and a Microsoft-hosted agent meets your needs, you can skip setting up a self-hosted Windows agent. Well, I guess you get what you pay for :).This article describes how to configure a self-hosted agent. That is to say: it would be even more incredible if it actually worked. I have concluded that it would be even more incredible if the plug-ins did not disappear and if the main application window for entering searches did not disappear. Incidentally, I've been trying Quicksilver (if you can consider 10 minutes trying it). They have features to both OF and to each other but capabilities potentially complementary to OF. But to find complementary capabilities, I am now evaluating Devonthink, YEP, Pagico, Scrivener and others. I have no plans to abandon OF and eagerly await version 2. Oh! Oops! I guess I had better not bring up the dreaded word, "priorities," because that has no place in the formal GTD canon.ĭo you see the problem? Or at least one manifestation of it? I wonder what other cul-de-sacs other OF users have gotten themselves into? I'm sure there are others besides mine. Now what do I do? What capabilities will help me now, or would have helped me prior to entering those tasks, to be able to manage that volume? Now I have three thousand five hundred tasks in OF. Instead: consider: What other types of functionality absent from OF are needed to get things done? Define the possible range of choices for complementary capabilities, not around what packages are out there, but around what key capabilities does OF lack that are required to get things done.įor example, suppose you've finally gotten through your inbox. Ignore the fact that related software packages seem to proliferate like mushrooms after the rain, further aggravating the difficulty of selecting a suitable one. Ignore for the moment the choice of a particular software package. ![]() So, therefore, what about project planning and related abilities? What about it when, by widespread consensus, OF is not made or meant for it? "no end of apps" - how true! But, what about the need for project planning and managing thousands of resource documents and relationships among them, abilities which I believe are absent from OF?Įven OmniGroup appears to recognize that OF is not suited to that, until the underlying information about task/project goals and dependencies and appropriate scope and timing have already been figured out, ie., identified and evaluated, which OF is not meant to supprt hence the frequency with which so many OF users rely also on OmniOutliner to really get things done. I've settled on OmniFocus, and I firmly believe that making a choice and getting on with it is the most effective thing I can do. That's not going to happen, but perhaps more importantly, the key is to pick something that's good enough, and then leverage it to accomplish the things you'd really like to accomplish. ![]() For myself, I've played with a bunch of the apps that are vying for this same space (iGTD, Things, Midnight Inbox, Thinking Rock, and OmniFocus), and there are elements of all of them that I'd like to see in one single app. With all due respect, there will be no end of apps that perform various functions that are related to what OmniFocus provides, and I just think that, at some point, you have to decide to fish or cut bait. Not really sure what I'm trying to say here, apart from to point out this other cool product that's making me go 'argh what do i do' when it comes up on special offer! Now I know this isn't what OF is designed for, BUT I Think the OG could learn things here - even though they have OmniPlan for larger project management - in terms of the dynamic, automatic linking etc. everything is a dynamically generated web/AJAX page running inside a rudimentary browser. While I know this is a bit different to OF's objectives, I'm definitely contemplating it (with 50% off) because:īUT: -it runs in a slightly odd 'Web 2.0' environment - i.e. I particularly like the graphical Gantt chart-style to do list it can give you. This can include files, contacts, tasks etc. So Pagico landed in my Inbox (the Mail variety) from MacZot today and I have to say it looks pretty cool.basically its a database which can store everything relating to a topic, and manage the links between those topics.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |